UC Santa Cruz Skip UC Seal
Long Range Development Plan 2005-2020  

LRDP Home | LRDP Committee | Public Workshops | Document Library

 
 
LRDP Committee Meeting #8
line
May 18, 2004, 5:30 PM, University Inn and Conference Center, Sierra Room

Joint LRDP Committee/Strategic Futures Committee

Preliminary Draft Land Use Concept Plan Options
(Break-out Sessions)

  • Option A:  Loop Road Option
    • maintains the 1988 LRDP land use boundaries
    • moderate academic core expansion
    • extends Meyer Drive
    • completes the North Loop road
    • new student housing mostly to the north
    • moderate student in-fill housing
       
  • Option B:  Expanded Core ("Loose Fit") Option
    • requires changes to the 1988 LRDP campus natural reserve boundaries
    • potential for an expanded academic core
    • extends Meyer Drive
    • completes the North Loop road
    • moderate new student housing to the north
    • moderate student in-fill housing
       
  • Option D East-West Expansion Option (with Colleges 11/12 near OPERS)
    • requires changes to the 1988 LRDP land use boundaries (for new colleges)
    • minimal academic core expansion
    • extends Meyer Drive
    • does not require completion of North Loop road
    • locates new Graduate College at the Porter meadow
    • sites Colleges 11 and 12 at the existing OPERS fields
    • OPERS fields relocated and expanded to the south of existing fields
    • maximizes student in-fill housing
       
  • Option D':  East-West Expansion Option (with Colleges 11/12 north of Kresge)
    • requires changes to the 1988 LRDP land use boundaries (for new colleges)
    • minimal academic core expansion
    • extends Meyer Drive
    • does not require completion of North Loop road
    • locates new Graduate College at the north end of Porter meadow
    • sites Colleges 11 and 12 located north of Kresge College
    • OPERS fields relocated and expanded to the south of existing fields
    • maximizes student in-fill housing

 

Note:  These options explore a range of alternatives for accommodating the LRDP program elements identified thus far.  They do not represent designs and are intended solely for discussion by the LRDP work groups (i.e., land use and environment; housing and student life; transportation and circulation; infrastructure and technology; and campus and community).  It is anticipated that a preferred alternative will be selected from among these for further refinement during the summer.

 

         

Copyright ©2003 UC Regents | Maintained by Dean Fitch