January 9, 2001 Meeting Notes
Approved:
2/27/2001
Committee Members
Present:
George Brown
Dario Caloss
Suresh Diffenbaugh
Lan Dyson
Jim Genes (for Steve Kang)
Gail Heit
Bill Hyder
Ed Houghton
Dave Kliger
Free Moini
Fran Owens
Tom Vani, (Chair)
Frank Zwart
Committee Members not Present:
Ben Friedlander
Dave Dorfan
Mathew Becker
Introduction:
Consent Items:
UNEX at Oxford Business Park (Santa Clara)
Sponsor: VC Simpson
Information/Discussion/Report
Items
·
General discussion
regarding the effectiveness of the retreat.
·
Attendees would have
liked the Chancellor’s presence at the retreat. I was good to hear the academic divisions’ plans.
·
Need to determine if
this will be an annual event.
·
Currently working on
charge and membership of the Task Force.
·
Growth &
Stewardship Task Force deliverables should coincide with the campus budget
process to allow for proper resource planning.
·
Task Force will
report directly to ACF and indirectly to PAC.
·
Task Force role will
be coordinated with Senate committee.
·
Suggestions
included:
a) Review of deferred maintenance priorities by ACF
(including long term DM planning)
b) Whether the ACF should provide guidance for
construction projects, especially considering the number of projects having
cost overruns.
c) Timeline for decision making related to specific
projects.
·
Other suggestions
can be forwarded to Fran Owens.
Presenter: Fran Owens
Handout: Space Plan
·
General discussion
about what people would like to see in a space plan, which will help define a
capital improvement plan beyond the current 5-year plan.
·
Need to translate
space needs into building programs.
Prioritization is key.
·
Need to discuss and
address result of off-campus centers and summer enrollment on space plans.
·
Plan won’t be
discipline specific.
·
Academic budget
process will help inform space plan each year
·
Considerations:
a) What do we want the campus build-out to look like
in 10 years?
b) Adjacency/Clustering – Who/What programs should be
next to each other?
c) What are the Short term planning needs while new
buildings are constructed?
·
Critical areas this
year:
a) Humanities/Social Sciences
b) Natural Sciences
c) Administrative Space
d) Engineering
·
Suggestions:
a) Add a “problem statement” to the space plan.
b) Reduce the number of options/variables on the
table and focus on certain ones.
c) Look at future leasing needs. Possibly use funds to buy building(s)
instead by pooling resources.
d) Feasibility of light-frame buildings.
e) Determine the magnitude of the short-term space
problem.
f) Academic Division/BAS/SA needs for space for
faculty, staff, and seismic relocations.
Member Items:
·
Kerr Hall
Soon
to be considered is the issue of what to do with Kerr Hall when PSB is
complete. Use for short term academic
needs? Administrative? Should the Graduate Division be moved? What about University Advancement?
Capital
Planning is considering these units and is working on a space plan for Kerr. Scenarios will be available for ACF by the
end of the quarter.
Next Scheduled
Meeting:
· January 23 from 3:00 – 5:00 at 481 McHenry.