INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY COMMITTEE MEETING NOTES

October 3, 2001

Time: 2:00-4:00

Location: Kerr Hall 307

 

I.    Welcome and Introductions

§         Members Present:  Scotty Brookie, Mark Cianca, Pat LeCuyer, Larry Merkley, Bob White, Kathleen Dettman, Terry Schalk, Bill Hyder, Bruce Cooperstein, Charlie McDowell.

§         Staff Present:  Max Ritchie, Fana O’Halloran

 

II.  Chair Announcements

§         An undergraduate student representative is needed for the committee.  Larry has asked for suggestions or recommendations from committee members.

 

§         UC is looking for a new Human Resources system.  An outside consulting firm has advised that this project may cost $80 million dollars.  The HR system at UCSC is not a priority at this point, but if the state were to fund the project the group would support it.

 

§         Over the summer the UC was audited with short notice to report all IT spending dating back to 1987.  Though it was difficult to report all IT expenses, a response was provided in that time frame.

 

III. Status Report

§         AIS Project- The AIS Executive Committee has not formally met yet.  During the end of July and the beginning of August, consultants were brought in to work on a comprehensive draft implementation plan for the project.  This should be finished by mid October, at which point Francisco Hernandez will solicit feedback.  Ideally, a working test module will be online in June 2002, with full implementation by Fall 2003.  Examples of working AIS programs can be found at Johns Hopkins University and University of Arizona.

 

§         The state is currently having budget problems, and UC has had many initiatives cut back this year.  At this point, no one is sure of the implications. 

 

IV.  ITC’s agenda for 2001-2002 -

 

Chair Merkley circulated an email asking committee members to prioritize various issues that the group will discuss this year.  High priority items were deemed to be ‘essential to achieve campus goals’.  Medium priority: ‘important to the campus, but could be dealt with later’.  Low priority: ‘Interesting idea, we'll get to it if we have time’.

 

High priority items included:

§         Policies

§         Security

§         Email

§         Oversight

§         Instructional Support

 

 

Medium priority items included:

§         Web presence

§         ECP

§         Network rates

§         Data warehouse

§         FIS

 

Medium priority items will be discussed at the next meeting. There were no low priority items. 

 

High priority items discussed were:

 

 

 

 

 

 

V.    Other Committee Business

 

VI. Next Meeting:  Thursday, October 25, 2001, 10:00-12:00, McHenry Library, Room 481

 

VII. Adjournment:  4:00 PM