|
|
|
Skip |
|
| 2000-2004 WASC Accreditation |
|
|
4.2: Planning processes at the institution define and, to the extent possible, align academic, personnel, fiscal, physical, and technological needs with the strategic objectives and priorities of the institution.
The alignment of resource allocations with campus planning objectives is best described in two documents:
Executive Budget Committee. Anticipating that the economic climate for UCSC has turned chilly and could become frostier in future years, in fall 2002 the campus initiated a broad discussion of more efficient ways of conducting our business that would reduce costs while at the same time expanding the institution’s capacity to educate students and conduct research. We are embarking on a systematic set of strategic actions to eliminate unnecessary costs, to strengthen the effectiveness of key campus functions, and to provide the capacity to support future programmatic growth. To begin the consultation process, in December 2002, UC Santa Cruz established an Executive Budget Committee (EBC) as an overall advisory body to the Chancellor and the Campus Provost on budget issues and priorities. In January 2003, the EBC engaged AVCOR Consulting, a privately held consulting firm, to help the campus undertake an agenda of change. Together with AVCOR, the EBC challenged campus leaders to look beyond traditional solutions to save costs – most notably “across-the-board” cuts to unit budgets – and instead to review critically the traditional ways we have conducted business with an eye towards specific strategic reductions. Three project teams focused on 1) Policies, Practices, and Procedures, including most general and administrative functions on campus, including information technology; 2) Academic Instruction and Research; and 3) Revenue Generation. The first two teams were each charged with formulating strategies to drive $10 million of costs off campus; the third was charged with formulating plans to bring $5 million in new revenues to campus. In response to an open call to submit their ideas and suggestions for consideration, staff, faculty and students offered influential suggestions. A number of Academic Senate Committees, in particular the Committee on Planning and Budget, provided valuable insight into the development of many of the initiatives. The community offered over 100 suggestions, of which 50 were worthy of detailed analysis, and 20 deemed appropriate for implementation, falling into the following categories:
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copyright ©2003 UC Regents | Maintained by susan.jessen@adm.ucsc.edu |
|