UC Santa Cruz Skip UC Seal
 2000-2004 WASC Accreditation  

Accreditation Home | Process | Presentation

 
 
Accreditation Process
 
Regional WASC website
WASC Requirements
[pdf]

Download WASC Requirements in pdf
WASC Evidence Guide [pdf]

WASC Contact Information:
985 Atlantic Avenue, Suite 100
Alameda, CA 94501
(510) 748-9001
  Committees

EVC Simpson's Appointment Letter and Process Paper [pdf]

List of WASC Committee Members

WASC Visiting Teams [pdf]

  Latest Updates

News
Reaccreditation process served internal, external purposes [UCSC Currents, 9/19/05]

Accreditation committee report submitted to campus, available online [UCSC Currents, 3/14/05]

Accreditation committee to meet with administration, faculty [UCSC Currents, 1/31/05]

Accreditation team visits UCSC [UCSC Currents, 2/16/04]

Accreditation team will visit UCSC on February 4-6 [UCSC Currents, 1/26/04]

VPDUE Goff 9/2003 presentation at fall leadership conference [printable version]

VPDUE Goff 12/2000 UCSC submission for Report to the Legislature [pdf].

UC Systemwide 3/2001 Report to the Legislature [pdf]

 

         
line

Accreditation Overview

Every decade, UC Santa Cruz undergoes accreditation by the Western Association of Schools and Colleges (WASC).  At the time of the last WASC review in 1994, the Commission made recommendations in several key areas, including Undergraduate and Graduate Education, Research/Creative Activity, and Diversity.  Since then the campus has dealt with many of the previously-identified issues.  In the area of Undergraduate Education, the newly appointed Vice Provost and Dean for Undergraduate Education has focused on improving advising, devoting significant new resources to improvements such as additional staff advisors and support for faculty involvement.  In 2000-01, the faculty unanimously approved a policy to institute a traditional letter grading system in addition to continuing Narrative Evaluations.  A full-time Dean of Graduate Education was also appointed, providing the "forceful advocacy" and increased coherence urged by the last WASC review team, and a graduate center has been built near the campus core.  This new review period will be one in which much greater attention and resources will be devoted to graduate issues.

Indeed, much has changed since our last review, including the process and standards by which WASC assesses colleges and universities.  The new 2001 WASC self-study process is designed to engage campuses in meaningful self-reflection and self-assessment.  It is intended to help us establish our own objectives and assess progress in achieving them, rather than to test our compliance on a standardized, externally generated set of criteria, as under the old accreditation process.

AS UC Santa Cruz begins a new WASC review cycle, the campus is embarking on a period of unprecedented growth.  Such growth will provide the campus with the opportunity to expand its graduate programs--a goal of the campus that was iterated in the campus' last long range development plan (1988), but not realized because of the economic downturns during the 1990s.  This period of ensuing growth presents the campus with exciting opportunities to develop and mature as an institution but, because of the cyclical nature of the California economy, UC Santa Cruz also faces significant challenges.  As the campus grows, particularly in the proportion of graduate enrollments, UC Santa Cruz is committed to maintaining excellence in undergraduate education.  Maintaining the quality of our undergraduate programs, while simultaneously expanding our graduate education mission will be challenging.

Given the current context, UCSC will focus the educational effectiveness component of the WASC self-study on (i) growth and improvement of graduate programs, and (ii) enhancement of undergraduate academic engagement.  Both of these topics will focus on students' educational goals.  Revisions to the departmental review procedure will provide a key mechanism for this enhanced capacity.  Therefore our third topic, which will be part of the preparatory review, will be (iii) improving program review procedures.

This web site makes available all of the key documents and data sources related to our accreditation effort to encourage the broadest possible participation in and dissemination of the results of our collective efforts. We invite you to explore this website and to give us your feedback!

 

 

         

Copyright ©2003 UC Regents | Maintained by susan.jessen@adm.ucsc.edu